A structured worksheet for schedules, decisions, transitions, communication and review terms.
Use it when: before proposing a parenting plan or attending mediation.
Download the worksheetCurrent legal informationReviewed through July 2026This guide provides general information, not advice about a specific matter.
These tools help turn broad parenting positions into a child-focused plan, a usable weekly schedule and evidence that can be evaluated against Alberta’s legal tests.
A structured worksheet for schedules, decisions, transitions, communication and review terms.
Use it when: before proposing a parenting plan or attending mediation.
Download the worksheetOrganizes the proposed move, the child’s day-to-day plan, realistic alternatives and evidence relevant to the legal relocation factors.
Use it when: before giving relocation notice, objecting to a move or preparing a mobility proposal.
Download the worksheetA neutral log for schedules, decisions, expenses and child-related events without argumentative commentary.
Use it when: when facts are disputed and you need a reliable record rather than a conflict diary.
Download the worksheetA form should do more than collect facts. These notes explain the hidden issue each worksheet is intended to surface, using concrete examples rather than a generic list of legal topics.
A schedule can look balanced on a calendar and still fail a child on an ordinary Tuesday. We test the handoffs, school logistics, belongings, healthcare, activities and decision rules that determine whether the plan reduces conflict in real life.
For example: A week-about schedule divides overnights neatly, but one parent starts work at 6 a.m. and the child’s hockey equipment remains at the other home. The solution may be a different school-night pattern, a neutral equipment handoff or duplicated essentials—not a debate about percentages alone.
Relocation analysis is not a contest between two cities. We build a concrete version of the child’s life under each outcome and test every promise that depends on a school, employer, caregiver, flight schedule or another person’s cooperation.
For example: A Calgary-to-Edmonton move may bring a better job and family support, but the proposal also needs a school plan, realistic winter travel, costs, missed-flight contingencies and a schedule that preserves the child’s relationship with the other parent. A confirmed offer and travel calendar carry more weight than hopeful estimates.
The most useful parenting record is selective, factual and tied to the child—not a transcript of adult conflict. We designed this log to show patterns a decision-maker can evaluate while reducing the temptation to turn every irritation into evidence.
For example: “Pickup was at 5:18 p.m.; the child missed the 5:15 counselling appointment” is useful. “Always selfish and late” is an argument. Record the scheduled time, actual event, child impact, message or receipt, and any practical fix proposed.
People still search for child custody and access, and older agreements and orders may use those words. Current federal divorce law instead speaks about parenting time, decision-making responsibility and contact. Alberta’s Family Law Act focuses on guardianship, parenting time and parenting responsibilities.
Parenting time is about when a child is in a person's care. Decision-making responsibility is about the important decisions — health, education, culture, language, religion and significant activities. The precise wording, and which statute governs, matter when an existing order is being interpreted or changed.
The child’s best interests are the only consideration when a court makes a parenting order under the Divorce Act. Alberta legislation also requires child-focused decisions. There is no automatic presumption that equal time, sole decision-making or any named schedule is best for every child.
What counts? The child's needs and stage of development, relationships with parents, siblings and other important people, the history of care, the child's views where they can be ascertained, plans for the child, each person's ability and willingness to meet the child's needs, and the impact of any family violence. Safety and well-being come first.
Labels matter less than the actual allocation of time and responsibility. Shared parenting time does not necessarily mean shared decision-making. Parallel parenting can reduce direct interaction in some high-conflict cases, but it is not a substitute for assessing safety or family violence. Sole decision-making may be appropriate where joint decisions are not workable or would put a child at risk.
Make the arrangement specific enough to head off predictable conflict, while keeping it workable for the child. Developmental needs, school and childcare, the distance between homes, work schedules and each parent's capacity to actually implement the plan all matter.
The Divorce Act now contains a statutory framework for changes of residence and relocation. A relocation is generally a move expected to have a significant impact on the child’s relationship with a person who has parenting time, decision-making responsibility or a pending application. Notice requirements, objection deadlines and burdens of proof may apply.
If you are considering a move, get advice before giving notice, committing to housing or changing your child's school. Existing orders and agreements can add requirements, and cases under provincial law require their own analysis.
If you are proposing or opposing a move, the result will turn on evidence rather than slogans about which parent is more committed. In Larose v Dorie, 2022 ABCA 98, the Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of a proposed move to Ontario and a request for sole decision-making. In another Alberta appeal involving a mobility arbitration, the Court set aside the relocation decision because the statutory best-interests and relocation factors had not been properly applied.
The practical lesson is that evidence about each parent-child relationship, the proposed plan, family and cultural supports, and the effect of the move must be connected to the statutory factors. A notice of relocation is not evidence of unwillingness to support the other parent’s relationship.
A final parenting order does not change simply because one parent now prefers a different arrangement. The applicable legal test generally requires a material change affecting the child before the court considers what new arrangement is in the child's best interests.
Enforcement options depend on the order, the nature and frequency of non-compliance, and the child's circumstances. Keeping accurate, neutral records and proposing a child-focused solution usually gets further than escalating routine disagreements. Urgent safety issues are different — they require a different response.
The Parenting After Separation course is required before certain Divorce Act and Family Law Act applications in the Court of King’s Bench, unless an exception applies. Alberta also offers mediation, caseflow and conflict-intervention services. Court of King’s Bench matters are now affected by the province-wide Family Focused Protocol introduced in 2026.
The right process depends on the governing statute, existing orders, urgency, family violence, and whether the parties can safely participate in dispute resolution.
Laws, court procedures and the application of legal tests can change. Obtain advice about the facts, deadlines and documents in your matter.
Start your new life.
We can help.